|
 |
 |
Home
The Walker Marine Story
Philosophy Interdependent high-resolution Air Gun Arrays
Survey Vessels
Tools of the Trade Mardaq-25 & QSeaCube Towed Streamers Trimble RTK GPS Navigation Interdependent High Resolution Air Gun Arrays Diesel Compressors & Tanks Transducers, Magnetometer & Side Scan Sonar
Services Suite 2D & 3D Marine Engineering Seismic Exploration Seismic Additional Services
Projects World Map of Walker Marine Projects Summary of Seismic Projects 2009: So. Florida Canals & Biscayne Bay Nat. Park 2009: Arabian Gulf 2009: Lake Erie, OH / Lake Cayuga, NY 2008: Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa 2007: Biscayne Bay National Park 2005: Niger Delta 2005: Waikato River, New Zealand 2003: Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador 2003: Kick’Em Jenny, Grenada, WI 2002: Republic of Mauritius 2001: Lake Macquarie, Australia 2001: Lake Tuggerah, Australia 2000: Bay of Chimbote, Peru 2000: Bay of Mejillones, Chile 1999, 2000, 2006: Canal de Chacao, Chile 1979-1988: Exxon Production Research 1983: Lake Tanganyika, Africa
Client Base
Publications
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
1999, 2000, 2006: Canal de Chacao, Chile
|
|
| Location |
Canal de Chacao |
| Type of Project |
2D swath seismic, magnetics, multibeam |
| Project Goal |
Map the geology for bridge piers |
| Equipment |
Engineering seismograph (1999), MARDAQ-25 (2006) |
| Project Description |
We mapped the Canal de Chacao with seismic, magnetics and side scan sonar in 1999 for the Ministry of Public Works of the Republic of Chile. The objective was to map the geology down to about 200 meters for the foundation of the world’s largest suspension bridge. After finishing the first survey and presenting my findings (no faults), I returned to Chacao in February, 2000 to take some cross-current data to verify that there were no transform faults running parallel to our original in-line survey. Core drilling in late 2005 has shown that there are no faults in the survey area.
We returned in 2006 to run another reflection survey using a 48-channel active streamer with MARDAQ-25. Multibeam was run after the seismic was completed. Again, results showed no faults or other geological anomalies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|